Peevyhouse v garland case brief
Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla. 1962), is a US contract law case decided by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. It concerns the question of when specific performance of a contractual obligation will be granted and the measure of expectation damages. WebCase Brief (19,448) Case Opinion (20,046) About 19,448 Results. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal Mining Co. 1962 ok 267, 382 p.2d 109 Lessors leased their premises to a coal mining company for coal mining purposes. The lessee agreed to perform certain restorative and remedial work at the end of the lease period, which it failed to perform.
Peevyhouse v garland case brief
Did you know?
WebThis appeal is taken from a summary judgment entered by the District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma holding that the asserted cause of action pleaded by plaintiffs-appellants had been fully litigated in the state courts of Oklahoma. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal Mining Co., Okla., 382 P.2d 109. WebIn 1954 Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse leased their Oklahoma farm to the Garland Coal and Mining Company for a term of five years. Strip mining operations were contemplated. …
WebSummary Documentary film about the infamous Oklahoma Supreme Court contracts case, Peevyhouse vs. Garland Coal Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla. 1962), involving the rule of damages for breach of explicit remedial provisions in a stripmining lease. Note Script based on "The unearthed facts of Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co." by Judith L. Maute. WebDec 6, 2024 · The Peevyhouse brought suit seeking damages of $25,000. The lower court ruled in favor of the Peevyhouse and instructed the jury to award damages based on the …
WebBrief Fact Summary. Willy and Lucille Peevyhouse (plaintiffs) owned a farm containing coal deposits which they leaded Garland (defendant) for 5 years. According to the lease, … WebBriefly stated, the facts are as follows: plaintiffs owned a farm containing coal deposits, and in November, 1954, leased the premises to defendant for a period of five years for coal …
WebCase Brief (19,366) Case Opinion (19,830) About 19,366 Results. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal Mining Co. 1962 ok 267, 382 p.2d 109 Lessors leased their premises to a coal mining company for coal mining purposes. The lessee agreed to perform certain restorative and remedial work at the end of the lease period, which it failed to perform.
Web1. Case Title: Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. 2. Citation: 382 P.2d 109 Okla.; Year decided: 1962 3. Facts: The Peevyhouses’, Willie and Lucille, inherited land from Lucille’s father. In 1954, in Oklahoma, Willie and Lucille leased their land to Garland Coal & Mining Co. (GCM) to mine the land for coal. matt heatersWebWillie Peevyhouse and Lucille Peevyhouse, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. Garland Coal & Mining Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee, 356 F.2d 979 (10th Cir. 1966) case … matt heatwole yuma azWebAnd this is illustrated in the 1962 Oklahoma case called Peeveyhouse versus Garland Coal Company. The Peeveyhouse case is incredibly famous, and it provokes passionate responses in generations of law students. In the Peeveyhouse case, the Peeveyhouses signed a contract allowing the defendant, Garlan Coal and Mining Company to stripmine a ... matt heaton rugbyWebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Company 1963. Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma: Facts: Plaintiffs own a farm, under some of which there was coal. Defendants leased the farmland for strip mining. One condition of the lease was that the land be restored to its prior condition at the end of the mining. Defendants mined, but then failed to do ... matt heating and coolingWebBest in class Law School Case Briefs Facts: The Peevyhouses (plaintiffs) owned a farm with coal deposits. They leased their farm to Garland Coal and Mining Company... Peevyhouse v. herbs you can grow insideWebAction by Willie Peevyhouse and Lucille Peevyhouse, plaintiffs, against Garland Coal & Mining Company, defendant, for damages for breach of contract. From a judgment for … herbs you can grow in kitchenWebThe classic 1962 case of Peevyhouse v Garland Coal & Mining Co. involves breach of a coal strip-mining lease. The company failed to perform promised reclamation work on the Peevyhouse farm. The cost of reclamation was found to be $29,000. The jury awarded $5,000. On appeal (by the Peevyhouses) the Oklahoma Supreme Court reduced damages … herbs you can grow in zone 7